M/S. H.R.D. COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE PVT. LTD. v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS.
WP(C)/2982/2020 · 2025-05-28
Michael Zothankhuma
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11928 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11928 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010147812020
2025:GAU-AS:6902
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2982/2020 M/S. H.R.D. COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE PVT. LTD.
FORCE PVT LTD. REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR MD. SUHEL AHMED 33 YEARS S/O JALAL UDDIN HEAD OFFICE AT S.T. ROAD BADARPUR DIST. KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN-788803 REGIONAL OFFICE AT LANE NO. 09 H.NO. 03 ZOO ROAD TINIALI GUWAHATI-781024 KAMRUP (M) ASSAM VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS.
MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS THROUGH THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA NEW DELHI-110001 2:SENIOR MANAGER(CONTRCTS AND PROCUREMENT) BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER AND POLYMER LTD. C AND P DEPTT.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING PO. LEPETKATA PIN-786006 DIST DIBRUGARH ASSAM 3:DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (HR)/ EIC BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER AND POLYMER LTD. C AND P DEPTT.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING PO. LEPETKATA PIN-786006 DIST DIBRUGARH ASSAM 4:GENERAL MANAGER (HR) BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER AND POLYMER LTD. C AND P DEPTT.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING PO. LEPETKATA PIN-786006 DIST DIBRUGARH ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2 5:MANAGER (HR) BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER AND POLYMER LTD. C AND P DEPTT.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING PO. LEPETKATA PIN-786006 DIST DIBRUGARH ASSAM 6:CHIEF MANAGER (C AND P) BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER AND POLYMER LTD. C AND P DEPTT.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING PO. LEPETKATA PIN-786006 DIST DIBRUGARH ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. S SAHU Advocate for : ASSTT.S.G.I. appearing for THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS.
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA ORDER Date : 29.05.2025 Mr. S. Sahu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. N. Deka, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 to 6 submit that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, this writ petition stands closed as infructuous.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant