JAGAN NATH AND ORS. v. A.K.MEHTA,SECY.P.D.D.AND ORS.
CPSW/186/2014 · 2025-12-12
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11926 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11926 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case No. : CPSW No. 186/2014 in
[SWP No. 2415/2013]
Jagan Nath and others ….. Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through: None Vs
A.K.Mehta and others .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Assisting Counsel to Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG
Coram:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER 12.12.2025
Learned counsel for the respondents, at the outset, has drawn the attention of the Court to the averments set out in Para 6 of the statement of facts filed on behalf of the respondents:
“6. That in compliance to the Hon’ble High Court directions the case of the petitioners have been considered vide order No. CEJ/DPC/02 of 2015 dated 19-02-2015 and the claim of the petitioners has been settled and the petitioners were regularized respectively from the date of availability of the posts. Copy of order dated 19-02-2015 is annexed herewith as annexure as R-1.”
Accordingly, she submits that nothing substantive survives in the petition and the same be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
( (ARUN PALLI) CHIEF JUSTICE Jammu : 12.12.2025 Pawan Chopra/Secy
Sr.No. 33 Pawan Chopra 2025.12.15 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document