SALIKRAM AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND ANOTHER
A227/310/2025 · 2025-01-23
Jaspreet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 119254 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 119254 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:4413 Court No. - 8 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 310 of 2025 Petitioner :- Salikram And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Sarjoo Ram,Aklavya,Mohan Lal Maurya,Prashant Shekhar,Ravi Kant Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J. Heard Sri Sarjoo Ram learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing counsel for the State respondents. Sri Ram Kumar Maurya learned Standing counsel has raised a preliminary objection to the effect that the petitioners have an alternate remedy in terms of Chapter 50 Rule 494 of the U.P. Revenue Code Manual. It has further been pointed out that the petition is also otherwise defective in as much as the party who had filed objections in the mutation case namely Sundara w/o Late Hari Ram has not been made a party. Considering the aforesaid, this Court is not inclined to entertain the petition which is, accordingly, dismissed leaving it open for the petitioners to take recourse as may be available to them under Chapter 50 Rule 494. Order Date :- 23.1.2025 Harshita Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench