Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11924 (HP)

JYOTI CHADDA v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/6296/2025 · 2025-04-21

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.6296 of 2025 Decided on: 21st April, 2025 _________________________________________________________________ Jyoti Chadda ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 and 2. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, accepts service of notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2. 2. Petitioner has assailed office order dated 07.04.2025 (Annexure P-1), to the extent it has transferred her from GSSS Dulehar, District Una, H.P. to GMS Bajratekoti, u/c GSSS Kui Bachhunch, District Shimla, H.P. The aforesaid impugned office order has statedly been issued 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes - 2 - as a consequence of rationalization. 3. At this stage, learned Deputy Advocate General has placed on record office order dated 11.04.2025, which reads as under: - “The transfer and posting orders of TGTs under rationalisation issued vide letter No. EDN-H (2) B (6)-1- 18/2025-(TGTs) Arts, No: EDN-H (2) B (6)-1-18/2025- (TGTs)NM, No: EDN-H (2) B (6)-1-18/2025-(TGTs) Med, dated 07.04.2025 are kept in abeyance. It is further directed that the TGT(s) who have not joined at newly allotted stations, should rejoin at their previous place of posting immediately.” Learned Deputy Advocate General further submits that as a necessary consequence of office order dated 11.04.2025, petitioner has not been relieved from her present place of posting. 4. In view of aforesaid office order, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this writ petition at this stage. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge April 21, 2025 R.Atal