IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 119 CHANCHAL SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. duped the petitioner of Rs. abroad, but 02.09.2025, Annexure P evoked any response as yet. the petitioner would be satisfied, if a time bound direction to respondent No.2 the same in a time bound manner. 2. 3. accepts notice on behalf of objection to the limited prayer made. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision CHANCHAL SINGH Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Dhruv Gupta, Advocate and Ms. Titikhsa, Advocate, for the petitioner. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel submits that duped the petitioner of Rs.6,65,000/- on the pretext of sending him but no action having been taken, a representation dated 02.09.2025, Annexure P-7, has been submitted by him, which has not evoked any response as yet. He, at this stage, on instructions states that the petitioner would be satisfied, if a time bound direction respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Kapurthala, the same in a time bound manner. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 4 only, at this stage. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.S.Bajwa, DAG, Punjab, notice on behalf of the aforesaid respondents objection to the limited prayer made. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-54975-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 29.09.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Dhruv Gupta, Advocate and Learned counsel submits that respondents No.5 and 6 have on the pretext of sending him no action having been taken, a representation dated 7, has been submitted by him, which has not at this stage, on instructions states that the petitioner would be satisfied, if a time bound direction may be given ntendent of Police, Kapurthala, to decide Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 4 only, at this stage. Mr. M.S.Bajwa, DAG, Punjab, the aforesaid respondents-State and has no PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.09.29 18:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-54975-2025 -2- 4. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to look into the representation dated 02.09.2025, Annexure P-7, expeditiously, in accordance with law. 29.09.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.09.29 18:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.