CWP-16385-2004 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 204 CWP-16385-2004 Date of Decision: 07.04.2025 Pawan Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - None for the petitioner Mr. Raman Sharma, Additional Advocate General, Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to the respondents to enlist him in List ‘E’ from the date his juniors were enlisted. 2. The matter was taken up for hearing on 12.07.2024, however, there was no representation of the petitioner, thus, Registry was directed to send notice to Mr. Anurag Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. 3. As per office report, notice was sent to Mr. Anurag Goyal, Advocate, however, even today there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 4. The matter is pending before this Court since 2004 and it cannot be kept pending for indefinite period. It appears that with the efflux of time, the petitioner has lost his interest to pursue the present petition. MOHIT KUMAR 2025.04.07 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgement. CWP-16385-2004 -2- 5. In the backdrop, the petition stands dismissed with liberty to petitioner to move an appropriate application within three months, if cause survives. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 07.04.2025 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2025.04.07 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgement.