LAV SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/1114/2025 · 2025-01-28
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 119171 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 119171 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:5581 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1114 of 2025 Petitioner :- Lav Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Vocational Education And Skill Development Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Kumar Srivastava,Rajesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Sri Ramesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing counsel for the respondents.
2. The grievance raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition is with regard to grant of sessions benefit extending his services to the end of the session as per the Government Order dated 29th August, 2013. It has been submitted that the petitioner is working on the post of Instructor/Training Officer in Government Industrial Training Institute, Aliganj, Lucknow and has superannuated from services on 31.12.2024. He submits that he is also entitled to the benefit of the Government
Order dated 29th August, 2013 and his tenure deserves to be extended till the end of the session.
3. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner shall stand substantially redressed in case petitioner's representation dated 1.10.2024, as contained in Annexure No.9 to the writ petition, is considered and decided by opposite party No.2 expeditiously.
4. Learned State counsel does not object to the limited prayer made by the petitioner.
5. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to opposite party No.2 i.e. Director, Department of Employment and Training, Lucknow to consider and decide petitioner's representation dated 1.10.2024, as contained in Annexure No.9 to the writ petition, expeditiously, say within a period of three weeks from the date a certified copy of this
order is placed before him, in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order and communicate the decision to the petitioner. (Alok Mathur, J.)
Order Date :- 28.1.2025/RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench