SUBHASH KUMAR SHARMA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. COOPERATIVE DEPTT. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/830/2025 · 2025-01-22
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 119170 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 119170 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:4023 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 830 of 2025 Petitioner :- Subhash Kumar Sharma And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Cooperative Deptt. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nirankar Singh,Ramesh Chandra Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Gaurav Mehrotra Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents-State No.1 and 2 and Shri Akbar Ahmad, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.3 to 6. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Akbar Ahmad, Advocate is taken on record.
2. There is consensus at Bar that the the matter in issue is squarely covered by the order dated 06.12.2024 passed in Writ A No.7820 of 2024 In re Kamal Krishna Mishra vs State of U.P. & 3 Ors, a copy of which is Annexure-9 to the petition. It is further contended that a special appeal filed against the said judgment vide Special Appeal No.09 of 2025 In Re U.P. Sahkari Gram Vikas Bank Ltd Lucknow & 2 Ors vs Kamal Krishna Mishra & Anr has been dismissed in limine vide judgment and order dated 10.01.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-10 to the petition. Thus, the judgment of this Court in the case of Kamal Krishna Mishra (supra) has attained finality.
3. Considering the aforesaid consensus, the writ petition is allowed. It is provided that the petitioners are also entitled to the benefit of the
judgment in the case of Kamal Krishna Mishra (supra).
4. At this stage, learned counsels for the parties point out that the petitioner No.1 has not been paid salary for the month of December, 2024 and petitioner No.2 has not been paid salary for the months of August, September, November and December, 2024.
5. In view thereof, the respondents are directed to pay salary to the petitioners for the aforesaid months without any deduction and continue to pay salary month to month in accordance with law under relevant rules, provided there is no legal impediment.
Order Date :- 22.1.2025 prateek Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench