Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11915 (AP)

Repalle Nageshwar Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/6106/2019 · 2025-08-03

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010139152019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 6106/2019 Between: 1. REPALLE NAGESHWAR RAO, S/O VEERA SWANNY, AGED- 69 YEARS OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O H.NO. 5-1A, CHANDALURU VILLAGE, J. PANGALURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. KASUKURTHI VEERANJANEYULU, S/O SUBBA RAO, AGED- 47 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O H.NO. 5-3B, CHANDALURU VILLAGE, J. PANGALURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, PANCHAYATHRAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 0/O SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYATH OFFICER, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE THAHASILDAR, J.PANGALURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2 5. THE MANDAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, J. PANGALURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, J. PANGALURU POLICE STATION, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 7. THE GRAMA PANCHAYATH OF CHANDALURU VILLAGE, REP. BY ITS PANCHAYATH SECRETARY, OFFICE AT CHANDALOOR VILLAGE, J. PANGALURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 8. REPALLE VENKATESHWARLU, S/O NARAYANA, AGED- 55, S/O NARAYANA, AGED- 55 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE-CUM- POLITICIAN, CHANDALOOR VILLAGE, J. PANGALURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 9. REPALLE SURESH BABU, S/O VENKATESHWARLU, AGE- 30 YEARS, 0CC- POLITICIAN, R/O. CHANDALOOR VILLAGE, J. PANGALURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondent No. 2 to 7 in not taking necessary appropriate legal action against the 8 and 9 Respondents and others by restraining their illegal installation of statue of Vangaveeti Mohan Ranga infront to Deity of Ankamma Temple beside R and B Road in Chandaluru Village, J. Pangaluru Mandal, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh as illegal, arbitrary, against rules and unconstitutional, consequently to direct the respondents to take necessary appropriate legal action against the 8th and 9th Respondents and others by restraining their illegal installation of statue of Vanga Veeti Mohan Ranga, near Deity Ankamma Temple beside R and B Road in Chandaluru Village, J. Pangaluru Mandal, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to stop the installation of statue of 3 Vangaveeti Mohan Ranga, infront of Deity Ankamma Temple beside R & B Road in Chandaluru Village, J. Pangaluru Mandal, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh forthwith, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. Dr CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3. HANUMANTHA RAO BACHINA 4. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 6106/2019 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Praveen Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri Challa Srinivasa Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that no further orders are necessary in the present Writ Petition as the matter has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 04.08.2025 SCH 5 148 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO.6106 of 2019 Dated:04.08.2025 SCH