RAM DAYAL YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. RURAL DEVELOPMENT LKO. AND 9 OTHERS
WRIC/652/2025 · 2025-01-23
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 119120 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 119120 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:4628
Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 652 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Dayal Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Rural Development Lko. And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Upadhyay,Diksha Tiwari,Saurabh Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the Standing Counsel.
2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer :
"Issue a Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the opposite party no.2 (District Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar) to take legal action under section 95(1)(G) of the Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 against the opposite party no.10 (Gram Pradhan of village - Patauna, Block- Katehari, District - Ambedkar Nagar), in order to serious embezzlement in the amount of Rs. 27,96,695/- of government fund has been done in connivance of opposite party no.8 (M/s V. K. Traders through its Prop. Vinod Kumar Singh who is the husband of Gram Pradhan) and opposite party no.9 (M/s Shashank Traders through its Prop. Shashank Singh who is the son of Gram Pradhan), in the interest of Justice."
3. Standing Counsel states that the notice was also issued on the application filed by the petitioner to the opposite party.
4. Considering the said submissions, the present petition is
disposed off directing the respondent no.2 to pass orders on the application, if already not decided, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of two months.
Order Date :- 23.1.2025 VNP/- Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench