IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 107 Gurpreet Singh Randhawa Gurpreet CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated 28.10.2024 Court in CWP State of Punjab and others” vide which direction was issued to the respondent (Annexure P perception and take appropriate steps, as may accordance with law, at the earliest preferably within the next two weeks, to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioner is not jeopardized.” COCP-3526-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.3526 of 2025 Date of decision : Gurpreet Singh Randhawa Versus Gurpreet Singh Bhullar, IPS, Commissioner of Police, Amritsar CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Damanbir Singh Sobti, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Punjab assisted by ASI Gurdial Singh. GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated 28.10.2024 (Annexure P-2) passed by a co Court in CWP-53874-2024 titled as “Gurpreet Singh State of Punjab and others” vide which direction was issued to the respondent “….to look into the representation dated 26.09.2023 (Annexure P-4) of the petitioner with regard to the alleged threat perception and take appropriate steps, as may accordance with law, at the earliest preferably within the next two weeks, to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioner is not jeopardized.” 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 3526 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-22.07.2025 …..Petitioner Singh Bhullar, IPS, Commissioner of Police, Amritsar …..Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Damanbir Singh Sobti, Advocate Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Punjab assisted by Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated ) passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Gurpreet Singh Randhawa vs. State of Punjab and others” vide which direction was issued to the “….to look into the representation dated 26.09.2023 4) of the petitioner with regard to the alleged threat perception and take appropriate steps, as may be required, in accordance with law, at the earliest preferably within the next two weeks, to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioner is not VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.23 09.50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document vide above said order dated 2 the respondents: (a) that the representation dated 26.9.2023 be decided in accordance with law; and (b) the life and liberty of the petitioner. informs that in compliance of the order dated 28.10.2024, a Speaking Order dated 10.11.2024 already stands passed. Copy of the same is handed over in the Court, which is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the by learned counsel for the State on instructions that upon proper investigation and enquiry, it was found that there was some threat perception to the petitioner and therefore, one gun to the petitioner the petitioner; thus, no cause survives in the present petition. passed in the present petition, the same is accordingly Speaking Order dated 10.11.2024, liberty is granted to him to challenge the said Speaking Order dated 10.11.2024, as per law. July 22, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-3526-2025 (O & M) It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that vide above said order dated 28.10.2024, two directions were given to the respondents: (a) that the representation dated 26.9.2023 be decided in accordance with law; and (b) th the life and liberty of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent, on informs that in compliance of the order dated 28.10.2024, a Speaking Order dated 10.11.2024 already stands passed. Copy of the same is handed over in the Court, which is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the State on instructions that upon proper investigation and enquiry, it was found that there was some threat perception to the petitioner and therefore, one gun to the petitioner; and now there is no threat to the life and liberty of the petitioner; thus, no cause survives in the present petition. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same is accordingly However, in case the petitioner is aggrieved against the Speaking Order dated 10.11.2024, liberty is granted to him to challenge the said Speaking Order dated 10.11.2024, as per law. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that 8.10.2024, two directions were given to the respondents: (a) that the representation dated 26.9.2023 be hat no jeopardiz be caused to Learned counsel for the respondent, on instructions, informs that in compliance of the order dated 28.10.2024, a Speaking Order dated 10.11.2024 already stands passed. Copy of the same is handed over in the Court, which is taken on record. Copy thereof is petitioner. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the State on instructions that upon proper investigation and enquiry, it was found that there was some threat perception to the petitioner and therefore, one gun-man was provided ; and now there is no threat to the life and liberty of the petitioner; thus, no cause survives in the present petition. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same is accordingly disposed of. However, in case the petitioner is aggrieved against the Speaking Order dated 10.11.2024, liberty is granted to him to challenge the said Speaking Order dated 10.11.2024, as per law. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.23 09.50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document