Akkem Masthan Reddy v. Andena Krishnaveni @ Krishnavenamma
CRP/587/2022 · 2025-06-25
T C D Sekhar
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11908 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11908 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010137612022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY. THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 587 OF 9n99 Petition under Article 227 of constitution of India IANo.26 of 2G22 in O.S.No.71 of 2021 Additional District Judge, Nellore, SPSR Neilore District. Between: aggrieved by the on the file of the Court of the VII Akkem Masthan Reddy, S/o Pulla Reddy, Aged about 64 owner, Mudigedu village, Inukurthi Post, Podalakuru Mandal, S.P.S.R.Nellore District years, Occ- Land ...Petitioner AND Andena Krishnaveni Krishnavenamma, w/o Narapa Reddy, Aged about 45 years, Occ- Housewife, R/o Velugonu (Vil), Thumayi Post, Rapur Mandal, S.P.S.R.Nellore District ...Respondent lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Nellore to withhold an amount of
/ % Rs.35,00,000/- from out of Rs.61,37,933/- lying on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Nellore, pending disposal of the C.R.P. Counsel for the Petitioner; SRI CH C KRISHNA REDDY ' ^Counsel for the Respondent: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following Order:
/ APHC010137612022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 587/2077 [3505] Between : Akkem Masthan Reddy ...PETITIONER AND Andena Krishnaveni Krishnavenamma Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.CH C KRISHNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: ...RESPONDENT
1. '/ The Court made the following order: It is represented by the learned that the cause in the revision petition does counsel for the petitioner not survive. 2. The submission of learned placed on record. counsel for the petitioner is
3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition i infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous application shall stand closed. IS dismissed as pending, if any, Sd/- K J RAJA BABU assistant registrar //TRUE COPY// a SECTION OFFICER To. 1- The VII Additional District records if any) One CC to Sri. Ch C Krishna Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]
3. The Section Officer. V.R. Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh
4. Two CD Copies Judge, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District, (with sree
high court DATED;26/06/2025 ORDER CRP NO.
587 OF 2022 DISMISSING THE AS Jnfructuous without CC«TS CRP '.*V