Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:4019 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 826 of 2025 Petitioner :- Narsingh Yadav Respondent :- Rajya Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad, U.P. Kisan Mandi Bhawan, Lko. Thru. Director And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajiv Srivastava,Baldau Ji Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Naresh Chandra Mehrotra Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Aditya Mohan, learned counsel for the respondents. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being disposed of. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having worked for sufficient period of time on work charge basis and on muster roll, the gratuity for the aforesaid period has not been paid to him. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent no.4 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before the respondent no.4 then the respondent no.4 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. Order Date :- 22.1.2025 prateek Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench