Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11900 (UTT)

ABDUL MAJID ANSARI v. HINA KAUSHAR

CRLR/687/2024 · 2025-08-14

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS CRLR No.687 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Krishan Mohan Joshi, Advocate for the revisionist. 2. Mr. Gaurav Paliwal, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Nalin Saun, Advocate for the respondents. 3. Both – learned counsel for the parties – unanimously submits that the some settlement has been arrived at between the parties and they have decided to file a petition for mutual divorce, before competent court of jurisdiction, therefore, the revisionist does not want to press this criminal revision and wants to withdraw the same. 4. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, this criminal revision is dismissed as withdrawn. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 14.08.2025 SK