ISHRAT ARA MISGER v. ALOK KUMAR AND ANR. (SCHOOL EDUCATION) (DB-II SGR)
RP/101/2025 · 2026-07-20
A, Mohd Yousuf Wani
Review Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1190 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1190 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No.19 REGULAR CAUSE LIST
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR CM(9050/2025) IN RP 101/2025 ISHRAT ARA MISGER …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Bilal Ahmad Malla, Advocate Vs.
ALOK KUMAR AND ANR ...Respondent(s) Through: None
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING) HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHD YOUSUF WANI, JUDGE
ORDER 20.07.2026
1. The petitioner seeks review of the judgment dated 29th April, 2025 passed by this Court in CCP(D) No. 41/2023, arising out of LPASW No. 173/2018, titled “Ishrat Ara Misger Vs. Alok Kumar and Anr.”, which is delayed by 215 days and, therefore, the instant application for condonation of delay has been filed.
2. The delay is sought to be condoned on the ground that, pursuant to the liberty granted by this Court as per the order dated 29th April, 2025, the petitioner first filed a contempt petition, which he later withdrew with liberty to pursue appropriate remedies. The reason submitted does not constitute a sufficient cause which prevented the petitioner from filing the review petition within time. As a matter of fact, the petitioner, with his eyes wide open, accepted the judgment under review and, accordingly, filed a fresh contempt petition. Arif Hameed I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 21.07.2026 15:35
It is, however, exclusively within the knowledge of the petitioner as to what prompted him to withdraw the contempt petition.
3. In view of the aforesaid, we see no reason or cause to condone the delay. Otherwise also, the petitioner has accepted the
judgment dated 29th April, 2025 and, having availed the remedy of filing a fresh contempt petition, cannot be permitted to seek the review of the said judgment.
4. For all the aforesaid reasons, this application is found devoid of any merit and the same is accordingly dismissed. Consequently, the review petition bearing RP No. 101/2025 is also dismissed.
(Mohd Yousuf Wani) (Sanjeev Kumar) Judge
Chief Justice (Acting)
SRINAGAR: 20.07.2026
“ARIF”
Arif Hameed I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 21.07.2026 15:35