Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11899 (UTT)

SAHID v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1057/2024 · 2025-04-24

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1057 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Bilal Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned AGA for the State. 3. By means of the present criminal writ petition, petitioner has challenged the Case Crime No.426 of 2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 333, 351(3), 352 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, P.S. Pathri, District Haridwar. 4. Learned counsel for the State on instructions would submit that after investigation, charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner on 07.11.2024 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he would challenge the charge- sheet in the appropriate proceedings before this Court. 6. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. 7. However, it is open to the petitioner to challenge the charge-sheet in appropriate proceedings, before the appropriate forum. 8. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of accordingly. (Pankaj Purohit J.) 24.04.2025 Ravi