Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11898 (CHH)

VIVEK AGRAWAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/468/2022 · 2025-09-11

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:46743-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 468 of 2022 Vivek Agrawal S/o Shri Chaturbhuj Agrawal Aged About 47 Years Partner M/s Vandana Auto, R/o G. E. Road, Raipur, District And Tehsil Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through- The Station House Officer, Thana, Supela, District- Durg (C.G.) 2 - Amar Singh S/o Shro Rai Singh Aged About 77 Years R/o Pragati Nagar, Krishna Talkies Road, Behind Dubey Tent House, Risali Bhilai, Tehsil And District- Durg (C.G.) 3 - Station House Officer Thana, Nevai, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. Abhyuday Singh, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Hariom Rai, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Purendra Khichariya, Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 12.09.2025 1. Heard Mr. Abhyuday Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Hariom Rai, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State/respondents and Mr. Purendra Khicyhariya, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No.2. ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA 2 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of CrPC with the following prayers : “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the FIR no. 198/2022 dated 06.03.2022 registered by Respondent no.1 and also quash the order dated 11.02.2022, passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Durg in Case No. 939/2022, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner state he wants to withdraw the instant petition as the closure report has already been filed in present case. 4. In view of the same, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn leaving it open to the complainant of the case to take recourse to law, if aggrieved by the closure report. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra