Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:4661 Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 39 of 2025 Revisionist :- Tauheed Ahmad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Chandan Tiwari,Ashutosh Shukla,Atul Kumar Pathak,Shivam Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Application for condonation of delay Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State. Notice to respondent no.2 are dispensed with in view of the proposed order. On due consideration to the submissions advanced and perusal of the affidavit filed in support of the application for condonation of delay, the application is allowed and the delay is hereby condoned. Order on Revision Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State. This revision has been filed under Section 19(4) of the Family Court Act, 1927 againt the order dated 19.9.2024 by which the recovery warrant of Rs.4,95,000/- has been directed to be issued agaisnt the revisionist in Execution Case/Criminal Misc. Case No.757 of 2024 arising out of Criminal Case No.461 of 2013. Perused the record. The impugned order dated 19.9.2024 (supra) is extracted below:- " पततवलल पपश हहई। पपकतर पर पतरररयत अपनप ववदतन नयतयवमत कप सतर उपससरत आयल। ववपकल कक ओर सप ककई उपससरत नहह हह। उसकत सरगन पतररनतपत पततवलल पर रखत पतयत गयत। पपनन पततवलल पपश हकनप पर ववपकल कप ववदतन नयतयवमत उपससरत आयप तरत अपनप पतररनतपत पर बल वदयत। इस सरगन पतररनतपत कप मतधयम सप ववपकल नप यह करन वकयत हह वक उसप महतवपपरर कतगजतत उपलबध न हकनप कप कतरर वह आपरत तहयतर नहह कर पतयत हह तरत नकल सवतल वमलतप हल आपरत पसतपत करपगत। परनतप ववपकल न तक सवयय उपससरत हह तरत न हल पतरररयत कक ककई धनरतवश अदत कर रहत हह, जबवक ववपकल वदननक- 27.06.2024 कक उपससरत हक चपकत हह तरत इतनप लमबप समय सप नकल न वमलनत अपनप आप मम ककई आधतर नहह हह. इसरलयप सरगन ववपकल वनरसत वकयत जततत हह तरत उसकप अनपपससरत रहनप कप कतरर एवय भपगततन न करनप कप कतरर तरत इस तथय कक दवषगत रखतप हहयप वक वह जतनबपझकर कतयरवतहल कक ववलसमबत कर रहत हह तरत पतरररयत कक ककई धनरतवश भरर पकषर कप रप मम नहह दल जत रहल हह, उसकप ववरद मप० 4,95,000 /- रपयप कमत वसपलल अरधपत जतरल हक। पततवलल वदननक- 12.11 2024 कक पपश हक।" Perusal of the record as well as impugned order shows that application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was filed on 25.8.2010. The revisionist was directed to pay maintenance of Rs.3,000/- per month w.e.f. 25.8.2010. It has been fairly admitted by learned counsel for the revisionist that till date not a single penny has been paid by him to the respondent no.2, wife. Learned court below has rightly observed that the revisionist is deliberately lingering on the proceedings. The respondent no.2 has been deprived from the maintenance since 2010. Considering the above, there appears to be no illegality in the order impugned. The revision, being devoid of merit, is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 23.1.2025 Madhu D.R/P.S Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench