BHUPENDRA SINGH (ACCORDING TO PROSECUTION) BUT ACTUAL NAME IS BHUPENDRA PRATAP SINGH v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/51/2025 · 2025-06-13
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118971 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118971 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:35536 Court No. - 11 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 51 of 2025 Applicant :- Bhupendra Singh (According To Prosecution) But Actual Name Is Bhupendra Pratap Singh Opposite Party :- The State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Home And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pranshu Agrawal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.220 of 2024 under Sections 316(2), 108, 351(3) of B.N.S. registered at Police Station- Alambagh, District- Lucknow. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 11.12.2024 against the applicant and Nikhilesh Maurya, stating that the informant's father had committed suicide after leaving a suicide note in which he has stated that both the named accused persons are responsible for his suicide. The suicide note mentions that the deceased suffered losses in his business and the named accused persons were demanding money from him. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is an innocent person having no criminal history and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. 5. The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that co- accused Nikilesh Maurya has been granted bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 06.05.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No.106 of 2025. 6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact as per the narration made by the deceased in the suicide note, he was under pressure because of financial constrains and he has not stated anything which may prima facie indicate that the applicant abetted him to commit suicide and a co-accused has already been granted bail,
I am of the view that the applicant is also entitled to be released on anticipatory bail in the aforesaid crime. 7. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application stands allowed. 8.
In the event of arrest/appearance of applicant- Bhupendra Singh (According To Prosecution) But Actual Name Is Bhupendra Pratap Singh before the learned Trial Court in the aforesaid case crime, she shall be released on anticipatory bail on their furnishing personal bond and two solvent sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of S.H.O./Court concerned on the following conditions and subject to any other conditions that may be fixed by the Trial Court: (i) that the applicant shall make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such
facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; (iii) that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court' (iv) that the applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted; and (v) that the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
Order Date :- 13.6.2025 V. Sinha Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench