Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11897 (MAD)

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE v. M/S ASHOK LEYLAND LTD

CMA/3651/2010 · 2025-03-04

Anita Sumanth, R Hemalatha

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:MHC:590 CMA No. 3651 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-03-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA CMA No. 3651 of 2010 1. Commissioner Of Central Excise And Service Tax Large Taxpayer Unit, 1775, Jawaharlal Nehru Inner Ring Road, Anna Nagar Western Extension, Chennai 600 101. Appellant(s) Vs 1. M/s Ashok Leyland Ltd 1, Sardar Patel Road, Guindy, Chennai 600 032. Respondent(s) PRAYER: Appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against order dated 07.06.2010 made in Final Order No.607-608/2010 on the file of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai. For Appellant : Mr.Karthikeyan for Mr.A.P.Srinivas Senior Standing Counsel For Respondent(s): M/s.R.Raghavan N.Murali For Sole Respdt 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 3651 of 2010 J U D G M E N T (Judgment of the Court was delivered by Anita Sumanth J.) Mr.Karthikeyan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant states that this appeal is not pursued on account of the litigation policy of the Central Excise Department, seeing as the tax impact is less than the amount stipulated under Circulars bearing No.F.No.390/Misc/163/2010-JC dated 17.08.2011 and 06.08.2024. 2. Recording the same, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed leaving the questions of law open to be decided in an appropriate matter. No costs. [A.S.M.,J] [R.H.,J] 04.03.2025 sl Index:No Speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes 2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 3651 of 2010 ANITA SUMANTH J. AND R.HEMALATHA J. CMA No. 3651 of 2010 04-03-2025 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis