Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 118966 (ALL)

RIMJHIM THRU HER HUSBAND DEEPU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 7 OTHERS

HABC/19/2025 · 2025-03-20

Rajnish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16157 Court No. - 11 Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 19 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rimjhim Thru Her Husband Deepu Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Kumar Shukla,Shreshth Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Vyas Narain Shukla, Advocate on behalf of detenue is taken on record. 2. This Court had passed the following order on 18.02.2025:- "1. Written instructions dated 25.1.2025 duly signed by Mr. Gulab Tiwari, Sub Inspector, Police Station - Naseerabad, District Raebareli placed by learned A.G.A. is taken on record. 2. In written instructions, it is mentioned that no complaint was lodged by the deponent of the present case. 3. List this case on 20.3.2025. 4. Issue notice to the private respondents. 5. On the next date, S.H.O., Police Station Salon, District Raebareli is directed to ensure the presence of detenue before this Court. 6. Applicant is directed to deposit Rs.25,000/- before the Senior Registrar of this Court. 7. In case, aforesaid amount is not deposited, direction regarding appearance of detenue will not be enforceable." 3. As per office report, Rs.25,000/- as directed by this Court by means of the aforesaid order dated 18.02.2025 has not been deposited by the next friend of the alleged detenue. However, the alleged detenue has been produced by S.I. Shri Gaurav and lady Constable Ms. Anita Chouhan, Police Station- Nasirabad, District- Raibareli. 4. Shri Ashutosh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press this petition and it may be dismissed as such. 5. The alleged detenue stated before this Court that she is not in any illegal custody and she has not married to Deepu and she is living with her maternal uncle with her own free will and consent. The marriage is claimed on the basis of agreement of marriage, which is not marriage in law. 6. In view of above, this petition is dismissed as not pressed. 7. The Police personnel, who have brought the detenue today, shall drop her to the place from where she has been brought, safely. ...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 20.3.2025 Haseen U. Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench