Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 118962 (ALL)

SMT. MANDHATA @ MANDHATA DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDU. LKO AND 10 OTHERS

WRIA/793/2025 · 2025-01-22

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:4035 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 793 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Mandhata @ Mandhata Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. Lko And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar,Shivam Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prashant Kumar Singh,Ran Vijay Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 1, 2, 3, 5 & 6 and Sri Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents no. 7, 8 & 9. No notice is required to be issued to respondents No.10 & 11 taking into consideration nature of order proposed to be passed. At the very outset, Sri Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents no. 7, 8 & 9 informs that subsequent to the suspension order of the petitioner dated 07.12.2024, a copy of which is annexure 1 to the writ petition, the petitioner has been issued with the charge sheet dated 18.12.2024 which has been sent to the petitioner. Copy of the charge sheet has also been handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioner today in Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the enquiry be directed to be completed within a specified time. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would be submitting his reply to the charge sheet within two weeks from today. After submission of the reply, the respondents shall conclude the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner within a further period of six weeks. Needless to mention that the petitioner shall cooperate with the inquiry proceedings and in case the petitioner does not cooperate in the inquiry proceedings, the Inquiry Officer would be at liberty to inform the petitioner in writing about his non-cooperation and the period of non-cooperation would be excluded from the aforesaid period. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 22.1.2025 prateek Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench