1 2025:CGHC:27004 NAFR HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1070 of 2019 Hardeep Singh Rajpal S/o Late Preetam Singh Rajpal Aged About 56 Years R/o Main Road, Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1- State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipurl, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Amity University Chhattisigarh Through The Vice Chancellor, Amity University, Math State Highway -9, Baloda Bazar Road, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Registrar, Amity University, Math State Highway -9, Baloda Bazar Road, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Assistant Registrar Amity University, Math, Math State Highway -9, Baloda Bazar Road, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 23.06.2025 1) None for the petitioner in two rounds. Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE 2 2) Mr. Topilal Bareth, Panel Lawyer for the State. 3) The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.i. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent-University to allow the son of the petitioner to continue his academic activities. ii. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent-University to allow adult students to leave the campus without any pass issued by teachers or without the requirement of parents consent. iii. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent-University to protect the ward of the petitioner as behaviour of the Vice- Chancellor is very aggressive and threatening, so that the students will get their study peacefully and smoothly in the college. iv. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent-University not to target the son of of petitioner in such a manner. v.That, any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper may also kindly be granted to the petitioner in the interest of justice along with costs of the petition.” 4) The petitioner was pursuing his LL.M. studies in the year 2018, and we are now in the year 2025. By the efflux of time, the petitioner would have completed his studies. Consequently, nothing survives for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is hereby dismissed. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nadim