NIDHI SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A483/54/2025 · 2025-01-23
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118932 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118932 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:4498 Court No. - 16 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 54 of 2025 Applicant :- Nidhi Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjeev Verma,Abhishek Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent. In view of the proposed order being passed, notices to respondent No.2 is dispensed with. The applicant by way of this application has prayed for the following relief:-
"I. Issue a order or direction to the learned Additional Chief judicial Magistrate IInd, District Lucknow to decide the complaint case bearing no.1696/2023 Nidhi singh vs parmanand Singh and others " filed by petitioner under section 12 of domestic Violence Act 2005, Police Station indira nagar, District- lucknow, filed by petitioner against opposite no.2 to 4, within stipulated time as provided by this Hon'ble Court in the interest of justice. II. Issue other order or direction to learned Additional Chief judicial Magistrate IInd, District Lucknow to decide the prayer of interim maintainence, which the petitioner has prayed for her Residential place at the house of resporident No1 Who is her husband. within stipulated time period of two weaks." A perusal of the record shows that Co-ordinate Bench of this Court has earlier vide it's order dated 23.11.2023 has disposed of the earlier petition filed by the same applicant for the same relief directing the concerned court to decide the complaint in issue expeditiously. Again the same relief has been prayed for
by the applicant by way of this application.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that even the application for interim relief has not been decided. This Court has noticed that already an order has been passed for expediting the case as stated above thus, for the same relief second petition cannot be entertained however, it is provided that application for interim relief shall be decided forthwith. The application is dismissed.
Order Date :- 23.1.2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench