Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 118903 (PNJ)

M/S PRANAV VIKAS (INDIA) LTD. THROUGH MD v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

CWP/17214/1999 · 2025-11-18

Jagmohan Bansal, Parmod Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 101-2 CM-5721-CWP-2011 in/and CWP-17214-1999 Date of Decision: 18.11.2025 M/S PRANAV VIKAS (INDIA) LTD. ...Petitioner Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. &Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL HON'BLE MR. AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present:- None for the petitioner Ms. Mamta Singla Talwar, DAG Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. On 14.01.2011, the following order was passed by this Court:- <Learned counsel for the petitioner statues that he has no instructions. Dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty to revive the petitions if cause of action survives within two months from today. A photo copy of this order be placed on the file of the connected case.= 2. In view of CM-5721-CWP-2011 seeking restoration of main petition, the matter was ordered to be put up along with CWP-9764-2007. 3. From the perusal of record, it appears that the petition was never restored. Even today there is no representation of the petitioner. It appears that with the efflux of time, petitioner has lost interest to pursue the present petition. DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.11.19 10:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CM-5721-CWP-2011 in/and CWP-17214-1999 -2- 4. Dismissed with liberty to petitioner to move an appropriate application within three months from today, if cause survives. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE November 18, 2025 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.11.19 10:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document