Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11888 (AP)

Karnati Rami Reddy v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/6085/2019 · 2025-09-02

V Sujatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010139412019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 6085/2019 Between: 1. KARNATI RAMI REDDY, S/O. K. BALA SUBBA REDDY, OWNER OF THE VEHICLE BEARING NO. AP39-T-0408, D.NO. 2-3, MAIN BAZAR, GULLADURTHI VILLAGE, KOILKUTLA MANDAL, GULLADURTHI VILLAGE, KOILKUNTLA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, GUNTUR 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, DUVVUR P.S., KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, , KADAPA, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, DUVVUR MANDAL, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toTo issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2' Respondent in seizing the Auto Vehicle bearing Registration No. AP-39-T-0408 by conducting Panchanama Dated 16-04-2019 is as illegal, improper arbitrary and without any power of authority under law and violation of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To direct the 2nd Respondent to release the seized Vehicle Auto bearing Registration No. AP-39-T-0408 through Panchanama Dated : 16-04-2019 of the 2nd respondent petitioner to release the Vehicle by furnishing personal bond pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. POPURI LAKSHMI PRIYANVITA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 6085/2019 ORDER: Ms.Popuri Lakshmi Priyanvita, learned counsel for the petitioner, has informed this Court that the cause in the present petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in the Writ Petition, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date : 03.09.2025 JLV 4 251 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 6085/2019 Dt.03.09.2025 JLV