Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11886 (RAJ)

MOHAMMED REHAN KHAN S/O ROSHAN ALI (FATHER) SHABNAM KHAN (MOTHER) v. UNIVERSITY OF RAJASTHAN

CW/4410/2024 · 2025-06-30

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4410/2024 Mohammed Rehan Khan S/o Roshan Ali (Father) Shabnam Khan (Mother), Aged About 17 Years, Through His Natural Guardian Mother Shabnam Khan W/o Shri Roshan Ali Resident Of Ward No. 10, Village Berwa, Tehsil Fatehpur, District Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. University Of Rajasthan, Jaipur Through Its Registrar, Jln Marg, Jaipur. 2. The Controller Of Examination, University Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Deputy Registrar (Examination), University Of Rajasthan, Jln Marg, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Laveena Agarwal for Mr. Tanveer Ahamad For Respondent(s) : Ms. Pragya Sehtia JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 30/06/2025 1. The instant writ petition has been preferred with the following prayer: “1. The respondents may be directed to allow the humble petitioner to participate in the B.A. Part-I Examination which is scheduled to be commenced from 21.03.2024 or on an extended date if made by the respondent-University. 2. The petitioner be held entitled to participate in the B.A. Part-I Examination in the interest of justice. 3. Any other appropriate order, which may be found just and proper in the facts and (2 of 2) [CW-4410/2024] circumstances of the case, be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking directions against the respondents to allow him to participate in B.A. Part-I examination. 3. Counsel for the respondents submits that pursuant to the interim order dated 21.03.2024 passed by this Court, the petitioner was allowed to appear in B.A. Part-I examination and they have no objection to allow him to appear in third and fourth semester examination, as the petitioner has already submitted the online examination form and he would be allowed to appear in the subsequent examination, in case, the petitioner deposits the requisite examination fee. A letter dated 24.04.2025 has been shown in this regard by the counsel appearing for the respondent- University. 4. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter, the instant writ petition stands disposed of in the light of the averments made in the letter dated 24.04.2025 written by the University allowing the petitioner to appear in the third and fourth semester examination. 5. The petitioner is directed to deposit the requisite examination fee. The petitioner be allowed to appear in Exam, in accordance with law. The result of the petitioner be declared after completion of the examination process and mark-sheets be issued. 6. With the aforesaid observations, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/94