RAM RAJESH TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 6 OTHERS
WRIA/728/2025 · 2025-01-21
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118858 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118858 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:3876 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 728 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Rajesh Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dr. Ajai Pratap Singh Chauhan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the material available on record. 2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that the petitioner was initially appointed on the post of Constable on 24.02.1984 in the Uttar Pradesh Provincial Armed Constabulary at 27the Battalion, PAC Sitapur. He remained there for a period of 37 years. In September, 2021 the petitioner was transferred to Civil Police. After completion of successful service, the petitioner superannuated from his services on
29.09.2024. It is further submitted that the petitioner was never subjected to any disciplinary inquiry despite of it the petitioner is being given lessor pension than the other similarly situated persons of the department. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of his grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation dated 04.09.2024, which is contained as Annexure No.2 to the writ petition, to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ayodhya, but till date, no appropriate decision has been taken on the same. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter at some length has prayed that ends of justice would suffice if
necessary direction is issued to the authority concerned for disposal of the aforesaid representation of the petitioner with expedition. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite parties has no objection if direction for disposal of the said representation is issued. 6. In view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, the instant writ petition is disposed of finally at the admission stage with liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation raising all his grievance within two weeks from today to opposite party No.6 i.e. the Senior Superintendent of Police Ayodhya, who shall consider and decide the same within six weeks thereafter in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order and the decision thereof be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. 7. In view of the aforesaid terms, the writ petition is disposed of finally. .
(Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 21.1.2025 Virendra Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench