Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 118838 (ALL)

RAJ YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/535/2025 · 2025-05-02

Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, Vivek Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:25556-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 535 of 2025 Petitioner :- Raj Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pravin Kumar Verma,Vivek Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Dinesh Kumar Ojha Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J. 1. Heard Shri Shubham Yadav, Advocate, holding brief of Shri Pravin Kumar Verma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents as well as learned counsel appearing for complainant/opposite party no.4 and perused the material available on record. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought quashing of the First Information Report dated 24.07.2024, registered as F.I.R./Case Crime No. 0332 of 2024, under Sections 308(6), 351(2), 356(2) of B.N.S., 2023 & Section 66 of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, lodged at Police Station Gomti Nagar, District Lucknow. 3. On 11.03.2025, parties were directed to appear before the Senior Registrar for verification of compromise. 4. The report of the Senior Registrar of this Court dated 19.03.2025 is on record, according to which, he has verified the compromise on 19.03.2025 The original compromise is on record as Annexure No.2 (Page No. 23) to the writ petition. 5. According to the terms of the compromise, parties have settled their dispute amicably. They further agreed to withdraw the cases filed against each other including First Information Report dated 24.07.2024, registered as F.I.R./Case Crime No. 0332 of 2024, under Sections 308(6), 351(2), 356(2) of B.N.S., 2023 & Section 66 of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, lodged at Police Station Gomti Nagar, District Lucknow. 6. Learned counsel for the parties state that the dispute has settled between the parties and there are no further claims or demands against each other with respect to the matter involved in the present writ petition. 7. Considering the terms of compromise, we, accordingly, quash the F.I.R. All proceedings/investigation which may have been held consequent thereto are also quashed and the writ petition is allowed. 8. The Senior Registrar of this Court shall communicate this order to the Court concerned for correcting its record, accordingly. 9. Learned A.G.A. shall communicate this order to the investigating officer concerned. (Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 2.5.2025 Praveen Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench