[2025:RJ-JP:38375] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15515/2013 Dinesh Chand Raigar S/o Shri Mohan Lal Raigar, aged about 21 years, R/o Mukam Post Anjana, Tehsil, Dist. Rajsamand, presently residing at H.No. 12, Near Gaushala, Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayati Raj, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Rajasthan Board of Secondary Education, Ajmer through Secretary. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Trinath Sharma for Mr. Rahul Kamwar For Respondent(s) : None present HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 18/09/2025 1. Petitioner has filed the instant writ petition with the following prayer: “A). by issuing an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus, the respondent be directed to examine the OMR Answer Sheet of the petitioner Roll No. 3702103 from “X” Series answer key in place of “W”. B) Any prejudicial order be passed against the petitioner during the pendency of this writ petition, same may be taken on record and same may be quashed and set-aside. C). By issuing an appropriate writ, order or direction, the petitioner be allowed to participate in the Third Grade Teacher Examination. D). Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumvent of the case all so be awarded in favour the claimant. E). Cost of the writ petitioner also be awarded.“ [2025:RJ-JP:38375] (2 of 2) [CW-15515/2013] 2. Admittedly, the instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner in respect of Rajasthan Teachers Eligibility Test (RTET), 2012 with the contention that on account of mistake, at the time of darkening a bubble of column No. 5 of the OMR sheet in place of ‘X’, petitioner had darkened the bubble of ‘W’, which has resulted in failure of justice to the petitioner. 3. The aforesaid factual dispute cannot be entertained by this Court in the exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and that too, after lapse of 13 years from the date of said examination. 4. In view of above, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is devoid of any merit and substance and is, hereby dismissed. (ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/52