- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2102 WP No. 202968 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO.202968 OF 2024 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: M/S. MANISH MAN POWER AGENCY, REP. BY ITS CONTRACTOR SRI. YALLAPPA B.KANDKUR S/O. BASAVARAJAPPA, AGE: 47 YEARS, R/AT PLOT NO. 71, UDNOOR ROAD, NEAR JAITEERTHA KALYAN MANTAP, KALABURAGI - 585 103. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE GULBARGA UNIVERSITY, KALABURAGI (GUK), REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, KALABURAGI - 585 106. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, GULBARGA UNIVERSITY, KALABURAGI, KALABURAGI - 585 106. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SUDARSHAN M,ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) Digitally signed by LUCYGRACE Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2102 WP No. 202968 of 2024 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE ORDER BEARING NO.GUVIKA/PAJA PAPUM GHATAKA/2024- 25/463, DATED 22.10.2024 (ANNEXURE-D) OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO ALLOW THE PETITIONER TO PROVIDE HIS SERVICES IN TERMS OF THE CONTRACT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) No representation on petitioner’s side on call. 2. Sri Sudarshan M., learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. 3. On 25.03.2025, following order was passed : “No representation on petitioner’s side on call. On the other hand, Sri.Sudarshan M., learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 appears through video conference and submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2102 WP No. 202968 of 2024 In the light of the submission thus made, writ petitioner is directed to submit as to why the writ petition should not be dismissed. List on 02.04.2025.” 4. Even on this day, there is no representation on petitioner’s side. These facts reveal that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. Therefore, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (Dr.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE SN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 71 CT:NI