Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 118794 (ALL)

KRISHNA KUMAR NIGAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE LKO. U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/582/2025 · 2025-01-21

Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:3893-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 582 of 2025 Petitioner :- Krishna Kumar Nigam Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Lko. U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Onkar Nath Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard. The petitioner was a tenant of the opposite party no. 4, a private party, therefore, we fail to understand as to what role the Government could have in such matter in restoring their possession or allotting fresh shop. So far as the, dispute between the petitioner and the opposite party no. 4, if any, the same is not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. As regards, the assurances given by the Government Officials, if it is so, the petitioner may pursue the matter with the said officials. The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Order Date :- 21.1.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Manish Kumar, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench