Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11878 (AP)

MUDDA SUBBA REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/8354/2020 · 2025-08-04

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010138832020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8354/2020 Between: 1. MUDDA SUBBA REDDY, FATHER NAME S/O.GANGI REDDY AGE 69 ADDRESS ANANTHASAMUDHRAM VILLAGE, PULLAMPETA MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. MUDDA LAKSHMI NARASAMMA, FATHER NAME W/O.SUBBA REDDY AGE 63 ADDRESS ANANTHASAMUDHRAM VILLAGE, PULLAMPETA MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, ADDRESS REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY - HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ADDRESS KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ADDRESS KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ADDRESS PULLAMPEA POLICE STATION, PULLAMPETA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ADDRESS RAJAMPET, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 6. THE TAHSILDAR, ADDRESS PULLAMPETA MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 2 7. MUDDA SIVASANKAR REDDY, ADDRESS S/O.MUDDA SUBBA REDDY, R/O.ANANTHASAMUDRAM VILLAGE, PULLAMPETA MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 8. MUDDA VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, ADDRESS S/O.MUDDA SUBBA REDDY, R/O.ANANTHASAMUDRAM VILLAGE, PULLAMPETA MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 2 and 4 in not registering FIR pursuant to the Petitioners Complaints dated 21.4.2020 and 24.4.2020 against the Respondents 7 and 8, as illegal and arbitrary and further direct the Respondents 2 and 4 to register the FIR and conduct investigation IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim direction directing the Respondents 3, 5 & 6 herein to immediately take action against the Respondents 7 & 8 restraining them from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioner over the agricultural land Ac.0-76 cents in Sy.No.219/2, Ac.0-84 cents in Sy.No.220, Ac.1-64 cents in Sy.No.221/1, Ac.0-46 cents in Sy.No.222 and Ac.2-27 cents in Sy.No.223, totally admeasuring Ac.5-97 cents and Ac.1-80 cents in Sy.Nos.215, Ac.1-06 cents in Sy.No.216 and Ac.2-10 cents in Sy.No.217/1, totally admeasuring Ac.4-96 cents, situated in Anantha Samudram Village, Pullampet Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 2 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim direction directing the Respondents 2 and 4 to immediately register the FIR against the Respondents 7 and 8 on the complaints dated 21.04.2020 and 24.04.2020 submitted by the Petitioner and proceed with the investigation, pending disposal of the above writ petition, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 3 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 06-05-2020 in IA 1/2020 in Wp. 8354/2020 and consequently dismiss the WP Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P RAMABHOOPAL REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8354/2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 2 and 4 in not registering FIR pursuant to the Petitioners Complaints dated 21.4.2020 and 24.4.2020 against the Respondents 7 and 8, as illegal and arbitrary and further direct the Respondents 2 and 4 to register the FIR and conduct investigation…” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that since the matter is of civil in nature, crime is not registered on the representation of the petitioners against the unofficial respondents. 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioners would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of, giving liberty to the petitioners to pursue the matter before appropriate forum. 4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioners are at liberty to recourse their remedies according to law before the appropriate forum. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.08.2025 UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.8354 of 2020 Dated.05.08.2025 UPS 49