Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11877 (AP)

M/s. Chandra Engineers and Contractors, v. S. SURESH KUMAR, IAS

CC/830/2025 · 2025-09-10

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010137902025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: Between: 1. M/S. CHANDRA ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS,, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, NADISETTY RAMACHANDRA RAO, S/O. LOVA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O. 67 ROAD, ASHRAM PUBLIC SCHOOL, KAKINADA, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT 53300 1. S SURESH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522237, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. SRI HARINARAYANAN I A S, COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. SRI P RAVIBABU I A S, COMMIS MUNICIPALITY, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 5. SMTVIJAYA KRISHNAN I A S, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT,A. P. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 830/2025 M/S. CHANDRA ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS,, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, NADISETTY RAMACHANDRA RAO, S/O. LOVA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O. 67-21-18/9, 6TH CROSS ROAD, ASHRAM PUBLIC SCHOOL, KAKINADA, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT 533001. ...PETITIONER AND S SURESH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522237, ANDHRA PRADESH. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522237, ANDHRA PRADESH. SRI HARINARAYANAN I A S, COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH. SRI P RAVIBABU I A S, COMMISSIONER, NARSIPATNAM MUNICIPALITY, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. SMTVIJAYA KRISHNAN I A S, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANAKAPALLI ...CONTEMNOR(S): IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI M/S. CHANDRA ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS,, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, NADISETTY RAMACHANDRA RAO, S/O. LOVA 18/9, 6TH CROSS ROAD, ASHRAM PUBLIC SCHOOL, KAKINADA, KAKINADA, ...PETITIONER S SURESH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT- FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, 522237, ANDHRA PRADESH. SRI HARINARAYANAN I A S, COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH. SIONER, NARSIPATNAM SMTVIJAYA KRISHNAN I A S, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANAKAPALLI ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents herein (respondents 1 to 5 in WP)/ contemnors for willful and deliberate violation of the orders of this Hon’ble Court in W.P.No.5882 of 2024. dt.03.04.2024 under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SULTANA SHAIK Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. VENKATA SAI KRISHNA PONNURU 2. 3 The Court made the following order: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 03.04.2024 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.5882 of 2024. Ms Shaik Sultana, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the respondent authorities have complied with the order dated 03.04.2024 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.5882 of 2024, hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the Contempt Case. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any in the Contempt Case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 11.09.2025 MP 4 146 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO:830 of 2025 Date: 11.09.2025 MP