Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11876 (DEL)

DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT v. ARJUN

CRL.M.C./748/2021 · 2025-03-21

Neena Bansal Krishna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~20 to 24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 748/2021 & CRL.M.A. 3732/2021 DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Panel Counsel and Mr. Ali Khan, Advocates. Versus ARJUN .....Respondent Through: None. + CRL.M.C. 2252/2021 & CRL.M.A.15077/2021 DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Panel Counsel and Mr. Ali Khan, Advocates. Versus AMIT KUMAR BHOUT .....Respondent Through: None. + CRL.M.C. 2457/2021 & CRL.M.A. 16155/2021 DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Panel Counsel and Mr. Ali Khan, Advocates. Versus PRADEEP ALIAS MACHENDER .....Respondent Through: None. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/03/2025 at 13:54:18 + CRL.M.C. 2458/2021 & CRL.M.A.16157/2021 DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Panel Counsel and Mr. Ali Khan, Advocates. Versus AJAY NAGARWAL .....Respondent Through: None. + CRL.M.C. 2460/2021 & CRL.M.A.16160/2021 DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Panel Counsel and Mr. Ali Khan, Advocates. Versus JOGINDER ALIAS JOHNY .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R % 21.03.2025 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits on instructions that he be permitted to withdraw the Petitions in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in Tarsem Lal vs. E.D, (2024) 7 SCC 61. 2. In view of the submissions made, the Petitions are permitted to be withdrawn. 3. Petitions stand disposed of. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J MARCH 21, 2025/rk This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/03/2025 at 13:54:18