DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT v. ARJUN
CRL.M.C./748/2021 · 2025-03-21
Neena Bansal Krishna
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11876 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11876 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~20 to 24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 748/2021 & CRL.M.A. 3732/2021
DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Panel Counsel and Mr. Ali Khan, Advocates.
Versus
ARJUN
.....Respondent
Through: None.
+ CRL.M.C. 2252/2021 & CRL.M.A.15077/2021
DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Panel Counsel and Mr. Ali Khan, Advocates.
Versus
AMIT KUMAR BHOUT
.....Respondent
Through: None.
+ CRL.M.C. 2457/2021 & CRL.M.A. 16155/2021
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Panel Counsel and Mr. Ali Khan, Advocates.
Versus
PRADEEP ALIAS MACHENDER
.....Respondent
Through: None.
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/03/2025 at 13:54:18
+ CRL.M.C. 2458/2021 & CRL.M.A.16157/2021
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Panel Counsel and Mr. Ali Khan, Advocates.
Versus
AJAY NAGARWAL
.....Respondent
Through: None.
+ CRL.M.C. 2460/2021 & CRL.M.A.16160/2021
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Panel Counsel and Mr. Ali Khan, Advocates.
Versus
JOGINDER ALIAS JOHNY
.....Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R %
21.03.2025
1.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits on instructions that he be permitted to withdraw the Petitions in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in Tarsem Lal vs. E.D, (2024) 7 SCC 61.
2. In view of the submissions made, the Petitions are permitted to be withdrawn.
3. Petitions stand disposed of.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
MARCH 21, 2025/rk This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/03/2025 at 13:54:18