RESHMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO.
BAIL/589/2025 · 2025-04-11
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118741 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118741 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:21861
Court No. - 17 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 589 of 2025 Applicant :- Reshma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Bisunbablu Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State of U.P. and perused the record.
2. The present second bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No.179 of 2023, under Sections 302 I.P.C., Police Station - Bachhrawan, District - Raebareli, with the prayer to enlarge him on bail.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in the case and he is in jail since
2.4.2023. He further submits that first bail application of the applicant was rejected on 4.10.2024 but till today trial has not been concluded. He further submits that he will not involve in any illegal activities in the future. In these circumstances, the applicant is entitled for bail. In case of being enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for grant of bail and submits that six witnesses have already been examined and trial is going on. He further submits that minor son of the applicant was examined as P.W.3, in which, he categorically supported the prosecution version and stated that applicant was having relation with the co-accused, Nanu and on the date of incident, they were taking liquor, in the meantime, quarrel was taken place, thereafter, Nanu was pressing throat of the deceased and applicant was holding the hands of the deceased, therefore, she is not entitled for bail.
5. Considering the rival submissions of learned counsel for applicant, learned A.G.A., material available on record, contents of F.I.R., including the depositions of P.W.1 to P.W.3, other relevant documents, nature of offence as well as facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that no case for bail is made out, accordingly, the present bail application is hereby rejected.
6. It is expected that trial of the case in question be concluded expeditiously. Order Date :- 11.4.2025 GauraV/- Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench