LAXMIKANT @ LUCKY RANA S/O SHRI NANDLAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/3859/2025 · 2025-05-07
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11874 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11874 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:19215] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3859/2025 Laxmikant @ Lucky Rana S/o Shri Nandlal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o House No. 3 F 44, Dadabadi Vistar Yojana, Nasiya Ji Mandir Ke Pass, P.s. Dadabadi, Kota City (Raj.). (Accused At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Samarth Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 07/05/2025
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.192/2024 registered at Police Station-Dadabadi, District-Kota City for the offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel further submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the complainant has invested amount of Rs. four lakh on 10.01.2024 in the different scheme floated by the petitioner. It has been alleged that after maturity date, petitioner has not returned the amount of Rs.
[2025:RJ-JP:19215] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3859/2025] eight lakh to the complainant as promised, in spite of the demands. He further submits that akin to such facts, Hon'ble Apex Court has held that matter appears to be civil in nautre. Counsel further submits that the charge-sheet has been filed in which it has been specifically stated that the petitioner has returned some amount to the complainant. Petitioner is behind the bars since
03.03.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Laxmikant @ Lucky Rana S/o Shri Nandlal shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/76