BADRUDDUJA ANSARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/742/2025 · 2025-01-21
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118735 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118735 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:3953 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 742 of 2025 Petitioner :- Badrudduja Ansari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shailendra Singh Rajawat,Sunder Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Shri Shailendra Singh Rajawat, learned counsel for petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the material available on record.
2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that the petitioner was appointed on the post of Constable in U.P. Police on 01.06.1983 and superannuated from services on
31.10.2023. After ending about 40 years of service and after his superannuation, the petitioner has been provided only leave encashment, gratuity and G.P.F. and only provisional pension is being given to the petitioner while remaining amount of full pension, gratuity, bonus and other admissible retiral dues as well as other service benefits have not been paid to the petitioner till date.
3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner would be substantially met, if the representation moved by the petitioner before the respondent no. 2 is considered and decided within a stipulated period of time.
4. Learned Standing Counsel does not object to the prayer made by the petitioner.
5. In light of the above, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before respondent no. 2 Commissioner of Police, Lucknow within two weeks from today and in case such a representation is moved, respondent no. 2 shall consider and decide the said representation expeditiously say within a period of six weeks thereafter by a speaking and reasoned order and communicate his decision to the petitioner. In case the petitioner is found to be entitled for the dues as claimed, the same shall be paid to him not less than four weeks from the date of decision taken by him. . (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 21.1.2025 Virendra Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench