NITESH KUMAR SHARMA v. KUMAON UNIVERSITY AYARPATA NAINITAL
WPMS/2798/2025 · 2025-09-26
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11870 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11870 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:8727 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/2798/2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
1. Mr. Dushyant Mainali,
learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Ms. Mamta Bisht, learned counsel for the respondent-University.
3. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standind Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement at the bar that subsequent to filing of writ petition, petitioner’s nomination was accepted, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous.
5. In view of the statement made by
learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed, as infructuous.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J)
26.09.2025 Aswal
NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9 802a3a08b08d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F 5C22DACF4F4610C1FE58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2025.09.26 04:37:23 -07'00'
2025:UHC:8727