- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2445-DB CCC No. 200066 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF APRIL, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K NATARAJAN AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 200066 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. AMIT KUMAR S/O CHANDRASHEKHAR AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O. PLOT NO.291, CIB COLONY, BEHIND CENTRAL BUS STAND, KALABURAGI – 585103. 2. CHANDRASHEKHAR S/O. KASHAPPA, SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LR (DIED ON 18.07.2009) SMT. MADHU W/O. CHANDRASHEKHAR, AGE: 64 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O. PLOT NO.291, CIB COLONY, BEHIND CENTRAL BUS STAND, KALABURAGI – 585103. …COMPLAINANTS (BY SRI S S HALALLI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIKASA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560001. REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. …PROFORMA PARTY Digitally signed by RAMESH MATHAPATI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2445-DB CCC No. 200066 of 2025 2. MOHD MOHSIN AHMED, THE TAHASILDAR, KAMALAPUR TALUKA, DIST: KALABURAGI – 585101. …ACCUSED (BY SRI SHIVAKUMAR TENGLI, AGA FOR R1; NOTICE TO R2 SERVED) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 & 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE RESPONDENT/ ACCUSED FOR VIOLATING THE ORDER OF LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE DATED 29.07.2024 IN WP NO.201691/2024 (KLR-RR/SUR) AND PUNISH THEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K NATARAJAN AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) This contempt petition is filed alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 29.07.2024 passed in W.P.No.201691/2024 (KLR-RR/SUR) by the learned Single Judge of this Court. The operative portion of the said order reads as under: “a) Writ Petition is allowed. b) A certiorari is issued quashing the mutation order passed by respondent No.3. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2445-DB CCC No. 200066 of 2025 Respondent No.3 is directed to restore the name of the petitioners in the revenue records as was available prior to the passing of the impugned order, within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. c) Liberty is however reserved to the respondent authorities to issue necessary notice to the petitioner, providing an opportunity to the petitioners to reply to the same as also of being heard and thereafter, pass necessary orders.” 2. The learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondent submits that pursuant to the direction of the learned Single Judge, the name of the petitioners is entered in the RTC. He has made available the copy of the RTC. The same is taken on record. 3. In view of the same, the present contempt proceedings are dropped. Sd/- (K NATARAJAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE MCR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19 CT: PS