PAWAN KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN.SECY. PANCHAYAT RAJ and 5 OTHERS
WRIC/9528/2015 · 2025-09-26
Manjive Shukla, Manoj Kumar Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118662 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118662 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9528 of 2015 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. None present for the petitioner to press the writ petition.
2. Sri Nishant Shukla, learned Additional Chief Counsel appearing on behalf of State submits that the instant writ petition has become infructuous with passage of time.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. September 26, 2025 Renu/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Kushwaha, Rekha Rani Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Hemant Kumar Mishra (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.) Pawan Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Panchayat Raj And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench