Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11866 (CHH)

KAPIL MITTAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/787/2019 · 2025-01-30

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:5529 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 787 of 2019 1 - Kapil Mittal S/o Shri Mohan Lal Mittal Aged About 45 Years Occupation Business R/o Kundla City Kharsiya Road P. S. And Tehsil Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. .........Revisioner, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate Surguja, Ambikapur Chhattisgarh. .........Res., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 2 - Krishna Kumar Bansal Aged About 65 Years. Occupation Business. Director M/s Hariram Krishna Kumar, R/o Bansal Bhawan Ramtekri Road, Jugaslayi, Jamshedpur Jharkhand., District : Jamshedpur, Jharkhand 3 - Neeraj Bansal S/o Krishna Kumar Bansal Aged About 40 Years Director M/s Hariram Krishna Kumar, R/o Bansal Bhawan Ramtekri Road, Jugaslayi, Jamshedpur Jharkhand., District : Jamshedpur, Jharkhand 4 - Dheeraj Bansal S/o Krishna Kumar Bansal Aged About 38 Years Director M/s Hariram Krishna Kumar, R/o Bansal Bhawan Ramtekri Road, Jugaslayi, Jamshedpur Jharkhand., District : Jamshedpur, Jharkhand ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shakti Raj Sinha, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. Laxmeen Kashyap, Panel Lawyer 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 30/01/2025 1. The learned Counsel for the petitioner contended that he wants to withdraw this petition. 2. As prayed for, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file all objections before the concerned Trial Court. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE Madhurima