K.Ramesh Kumar v. Smt.G.Annapurna @ Vallapuri Purnavalli
AS/595/2011 · 2025-04-22
B V L N Chakravarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11866 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11866 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010139082011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
APPEAL SUIT NO: 595/2011
Between:
K.ramesh Kumar
...APPELLANT AND
Smt G Annapurna Vallapuri Purnavalli
...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant:
1.
A V S LAXMI Counsel for the Respondent:
1. VARA LAKSHMI CHEKURI
The Court made the following Judgment:
Earlier when the matter is listed on 01.04.2025, under the caption “For Dismissal”, learned counsel for the appellant sought time and hence, the matter was adjourned to today. However, even today, there is no representation for the appellant, though the matter is listed under the caption „For Dismissal‟.
2
2. It is apparent from the record that the appellant is not evincing interest to prosecute this appeal.
3. In that view of the matter, this Appeal Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_____________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 22.04.2025 PSA
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
APPEAL SUIT NO: 595 of 2011
Date: 22.04.2025 PSA