HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1665 of 2023 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J. 1. Heard Sri Bal Mukund Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist; Ms. Anita Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no.2; learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. 2. The present criminal revision has been filed to set and aside the judgement and order dated 07.1.2022 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/ Special Judge, POCSO Act, Jaunpur, in Criminal Appeal No. 59 of 2021 in Case Crime No. 51 of 2019 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 34, 307, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station Shahganj, District Jaunpur. 3. The challenge in the above noted revision is to the judgment and order dated 7.1.2022 passed by the appellate court remanding the matter for deciding the issue of declaration of accused as juvenile. 4. Learned counsel for the revisionist admits that in compliance of earlier order dated 7.1.2022 passed by the the appellate court, the Juvenile Justice Board has decided the issue again since interim order passed in this case was not extended by co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 29.8.2024. 5. In view of the above, the above noted criminal revision is dismissed as infructuous. September 26, 2025 Ruchi Agrahari Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Bal Mukund Singh, Shri Prakash Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Anita Singh, Dinesh Kumar Misra, G.A., Mohd. Sarwar Khan (Siddharth,J.) Pawan Dubey And Another .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RUCHI AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad