VIRENDRA SINGH and ANR. v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN.SECY. PANCHAYATI RAJ and 3 OTHERS
WRIC/9508/2015 · 2025-09-26
Manjive Shukla, Manoj Kumar Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118637 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 118637 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9508 of 2015 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. None present for the petitioners to press the writ petition.
2. Sri Nishant Shukla, learned Additional Chief Counsel appearing on behalf of State submits that the instant writ petition has become infructuous with passage of time.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. September 26, 2025 Renu/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Kumar Misra, Rohit Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.) Virendra Singh And Anr. .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Panchayati Raj And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench