PRAKASH KUMAR ALIAS PRAKASH PRAJAPATI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3599/2025 · 2025-05-02
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11863 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11863 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:13342 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.3599 of 2025
------ Prakash Kumar @ Prakash Prajapati, aged about 26 years, S/o Surendra Prajapati, R/o-Sonvarsa, P.O. Pratappur, P.S.+ District Chatra (Jharkhand).
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Lal Chandrahas Nath, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. P.D. Agrawal, Spl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 02-05-2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Chouparan P.S. Case No.65 of 2025 registered under 223, 91, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, Section 22(2), 23, 23(3), of the PCPNDT Act, 1994.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is a Technician of an Ultrasound Diagnostic Centre who was involved in illegal ultrasound diagnosis without any license and was sharing the result of sex determination. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has got nothing to do with the ultrasound diagnostic facility. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-18 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 28.04.2025 passed in B.A. No.3292 of 2025. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 01.03.2025 as is evident from para-19 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Hazaribagh in connection with Chouparan P.S. Case No.65 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/