Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 118625 (ALL)

AZAZ AHMAD KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/571/2025 · 2025-02-04

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:7141 Court No. - 16 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 571 of 2025 Applicant :- Azaz Ahmad Khan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Syed Anzar Husain,Shahbaz Salam,Shahid Salam Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State. 2. Pursuant to the order dated 23.01.2025, a report has been placed by learned AGA before this Court which is taken on record. 3. It is not disputed between the parties that the holder in due course as a complainant is maintaining his account in Punjab National Bank, Branch- Trivediganj, Barabanki, therefore, in view of the provisions of Section 142(2)(a) Cr.P.C., the impugned summoning order has rightly been issued by the trial court who has jurisdiction to entertain the complaint under the aforesaid provision, and hence, this Court does not find any illegality in the impugned summoning order. 4. In view of the above, the application deprives of merits and is accordingly dismissed. 5. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant prays for and is permitted to move an application for discharge before the trial court through counsel which may be decided expeditiously by the Court concerned in accordance with law. Order Date :- 4.2.2025 V. Sinha Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench