Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11861 (GAU)

JAGJIT SINGH v. RAJENDER SINGH AND 13 ORS.

CRP(IO)/169/2025 · 2025-05-13

Devashis Baruah

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010094502025 2025:GAU-AS:6009 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRP(IO)/169/2025 JAGJIT SINGH S/O LATE DAVINDER SINGH, R/O BAHADUR SINGH BUILDING, HOUSE NO. 17, J.P.R. ROAD, GAR ALI, P.O. AND P.S.- JORHAT, DIST- JORHAT, ASSAM VERSUS RAJENDER SINGH AND 13 ORS. S/O LATE HARBANS SINGH, R/O J.P.R. ROAD, JORHAT, P.O.- JORHAT, DIST- JORHAT, ASSAM 2:NARENDER KAUR W/O LATE HARBANS SINGH R/O J.P.R. ROAD JORHAT P.O.- JORHAT DIST- JORHAT ASSAM 3:RIPUDAMAN SINGH S/O LATE HARBANS SINGH R/O J.P.R. ROAD JORHAT P.O.- JORHAT DIST- JORHAT ASSAM 4:SATPAL KAUR D/O LATE HARBANS SINGH R/O J.P.R. ROAD JORHAT P.O.- JORHAT DIST- JORHAT Page No.# 2/4 ASSAM 5:GURINDER SINGH S/O LATE HARBANS SINGH R/O J.P.R. ROAD JORHAT P.O.- JORHAT DIST- JORHAT ASSAM 6:JORHAT GASES (SHOP) J.P.R. ROAD JORHAT 7:JAINSONS (SHOP) J.P.R. ROAD JORHAT 8:SHIV LUBRICANTS (GODOWN) J.P.R. ROAD JORHAT 9:LUXMI AUTOMOBILES (SHOP) J.P.R. ROAD JORHAT 10:INDORIA SCOOTER (SHOP CUM GUDOWN) J.P.R. ROAD JORHAT 11:SHIV MOTOR AND TRACTOR (GODOWN) J.P.R. ROAD JORHAT 12:SUNIL HARDWARE (GODOWN) J.P.R. ROAD JORHAT 13:HARDEV SINGH S/O LATE HARBANS SINGH C/O NARENDER KAUR J.P.R. ROAD JORHAT P.O. AND P.S.- JORHAT DIST- JORHAT ASSAM 14:CHIRANJEET SINGH Page No.# 3/4 S/O LATE HARBANS SINGH C/O NARENDER KAUR J.P.R. ROAD JORHAT P.O. AND P.S.- JORHAT DIST- JORHAT ASSA For the petitioner(s) : Mr. T. J. Mahanta, Sr. Advocate Ms. P. Bhattacharjee, Advocate For the respondent (s) : XXXX BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R 14.05.2025 Mr. T. J. Mahanta, the learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. P. Bhattacharjee, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would not like to further proceed with the instant proceedings and the petitioner would be well advised to appear in the suit and file the written statement. The learned senior counsel for the petitioner therefore submitted that withdrawal of the instant proceedings should not prejudice the petitioner to raise the issues which have been raised in the instant proceedings before the learned Trial Court. 2. Taking into account the above, the instant proceedings stands closed on withdrawal. Page No.# 4/4 3. Liberty however would be there upon the petitioner who has been newly impleaded as defendant in the suit to file written statement and take all such pleas as available under law. JUDGE Comparing Assistant