APHC010139032019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 6102 OF 2019 Between: 1. P.Baleeswara Reddy,, S/o Veera Reddy, Aged about 70 years, Occ Medical shop Business, R/o Pagidyala Village and Mandal, Karnool District. 1. THE GOVT OF AP, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Pan Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The District Panchayat Officer, , Zilla Parishad, Kurnool Kurnool District. 3. Pagidyala Gram Panchayat, Rep.by Panchayat Secretary, Pagidyala Village and Mandal, Kurnool District. 4. Bilal, S/o. Musa Salam Aged about 28 years, Occ Business R/o Pagidyala Village and Mandal Kurnool District. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order, direction or a writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamu 25.04.2019 and notice dated 26.04.2019 issued by the 31d Respondent as IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 6102 OF 2019 1. P.Baleeswara Reddy,, S/o Veera Reddy, Aged about 70 years, Occ Medical shop Business, R/o Pagidyala Village and Mandal, Karnool District. ...Petitioner AND 1. THE GOVT OF AP, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The District Panchayat Officer, , Zilla Parishad, Kurnool Kurnool District. 3. Pagidyala Gram Panchayat, Rep.by Panchayat Secretary, Pagidyala Village and Mandal, Kurnool District. S/o. Musa Salam Aged about 28 years, Occ Business R/o Pagidyala Village and Mandal Kurnool District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order, direction or a writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the alleged auction held on 25.04.2019 and notice dated 26.04.2019 issued by the 31d Respondent as IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA 1. P.Baleeswara Reddy,, S/o Veera Reddy, Aged about 70 years, Occ Medical shop Business, R/o Pagidyala Village and Mandal, Karnool District. ...Petitioner chayat Raj 2. The District Panchayat Officer, , Zilla Parishad, Kurnool Kurnool District. 3. Pagidyala Gram Panchayat, Rep.by Panchayat Secretary, Pagidyala S/o. Musa Salam Aged about 28 years, Occ Business R/o Pagidyala ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order, direction or a writ more particularly one in the s by declaring the alleged auction held on 25.04.2019 and notice dated 26.04.2019 issued by the 31d Respondent as arbitrary, illegal without following the due procedure contemplated under law and consequently set aside the same and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the notice dated 26.04.2019 issued by the 3"I Respondent pending disposal of Writ Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: C PRAKASH REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 6102 OF 2019 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. When the matters is taken up for hearing, Sri M.V.Vijayaaditya Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri C.Prakash Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and the matter becomes infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 11.08.2025 KKV HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO.6102 of 2019 11.08.2025 KKV