IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 219 CRM-M-63653-2025 Decided on : 09.12.2025 Vikas Kumar ...... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...... Respondent CORAM : *** Present : Mr. Rishi Pal Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Shukla, DAG, Punjab for the respondent-State. *** , J (ORAL) !" #$ %&#%&'%& $%($&()(*$ + , - ) "$.-)) /01(,%,,, ) ( )& 2 )3 !" 4 MAMTA MALHOTRA 2025.12.10 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh ) 3 )) 3 ) !" , 3 , ) )) 4 , 3 - 5 1 6, 7)86 +) 0 ( 6 0 $'$$'$ #$ 0 0 ) 4 ) , 1 0 , 0 3 , 9 ) , ) ) 0 3 the petitioner has actively participated in the crime and does not deserve any concession from this Court He further contends that the petitioner has been constantly named in the disclosure statement of co-accused and is required for custodial interrogation as recovery of looted amount is yet to be effected from him. He further submits that the petitioner is also involved in one other case of similar nature meaning thereby he is a habitual offender. $ 3 MAMTA MALHOTRA 2025.12.10 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh # Having heard learned counsel for the parties at length and after perusing the record 0 0 : , -) ) "$.- 2 ) 3 ) ) ) - 0 )) ) 0) ) ; 0 ) 00) ) ' ! ) , <= , 0 %&;<2 , ) : : 0 , ) = !, 1) 3 > )< , ? ! "#$ % ! % & ' MAMTA MALHOTRA 2025.12.10 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh ( ' % ( < ) ) @ 50 0 0 , 0 ) , ; 0 ) ) * ! ) 0) @ ) . 0 )) A ? /. MAMTA MALHOTRA 2025.12.10 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh MAMTA MALHOTRA 2025.12.10 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh